Fantasy Football![]() 17 ![]() | Avoiding the New England backfield entirely might make your life a little easier this fantasy season. | |
| www.fantasyfootballfools.com | ||
907 days ago | reply | |
![]() 2 ![]() | I definitely agree with skipping this backfield. I'm always tempted to snag Taylor at the end of a draft, but I know it's just not worth the risk. With Belichick so secretive, there's no way to know who to start in a given week. | |
907 days ago | reply | |
![]() 10 ![]() | This writer (Reiss) believes that Fred Taylor will see the 2nd most touches in the NE backfield. Only Kevin Faulk will see more. *The NE backfield will be interesting to watch. It could develop into a frightening RBBC though. | |
| www.boston.com | ||
935 days ago | reply | |
![]() 2 ![]() | I definitely agree with skipping this backfield. I'm always tempted to snag Taylor at the end of a draft, but I know it's just not worth the risk. With Belichick so secretive, there's no way to know who to start in a given week. | |
907 days ago | reply | |
![]() 17 ![]() | Avoiding the New England backfield entirely might make your life a little easier this fantasy season. | |
| www.fantasyfootballfools.com | ||
907 days ago | reply | |
![]() 10 ![]() | This writer (Reiss) believes that Fred Taylor will see the 2nd most touches in the NE backfield. Only Kevin Faulk will see more. *The NE backfield will be interesting to watch. It could develop into a frightening RBBC though. | |
| www.boston.com | ||
935 days ago | reply | |